Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 01 Jun 2025 06:02:25 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        pkg@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 286455] pkg-audit(8) listing false positives for librewolf v137.0.2 with "vuln.xml" of 20250425
Message-ID:  <bug-286455-32340-CjHC3oOmMl@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-286455-32340@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=286455

--- Comment #8 from ax61@disroot.org ---
(In reply to Fernando ApesteguĂ­a from comment #7)
Since opening of this PR, I have been trying to understand seemingly not taking
the major version into account. From the attached JSON output ...

"pkg_count": 1,
    "packages": {
        "librewolf": {
            "version": "137.0.2",
            "issue_count": 6,
            "issues": [
                {
                    "Affected versions": [
                        "< 136.0,2"
                    ],
                    "description": "mozilla -- memory corruption",
                    "cve": [
                        "CVE-2025-1934",
                        "CVE-2025-1935",
                        "CVE-2025-1938"
                    ],
                    "url":
"https://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/b31a4e74-109d-11f0-8195-b42e991fc52e.html"
                },
...


Version of "librewolf" is "137.0.2"; affected versions are those less than
"136.0,2". So, does the commit imply that PORTECHO causes more weight to be
given to PORTEPOCH, overriding "simple" comparison of major versions?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-286455-32340-CjHC3oOmMl>