Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 00:30:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> To: Tim Robbins <tjr@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Macros in <stdio.h> Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10210140023020.14594-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20021014094459.A25812@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Tim Robbins wrote: > Since revision 1.25 of src/include/stdio.h removed the macro versions of > putc() and getc(), is there any reason why we shouldn't go the whole way > and remove the rest of the macros (*_unlocked()) ? These functions are defined by POSIX as thread-safe functions. The are allowed to be implemented as macros, but not required to be. You need to add them as functions before you can remove them as macros. I am not sure whether the performance gain warrants keeping them as macros or not. > This would let us make FILE opaque and move the definition of > struct __sFILE into src/lib/libc/stdio/local.h. This would also let us > remove the __sFILEX hack. -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10210140023020.14594-100000>