Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 20:05:19 -0400 From: Raoul Schroeder <memphis_ms@gmx.net> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: clemensF <rabat@web.de>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CPUTYPE and ports Message-ID: <3B8D833F.EA5C1E1F@gmx.net> References: <20010819061017.92A3438FD@overcee.netplex.com.au> <20010821181752.V45276@mail.webmonster.de> <20010821130119.H17739@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010830011735.D19000@spotteswoode.yi.org> <20010829163426.D77273@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > how come AMD processors aren't supported (yet) bu gcc? On a related topic (which had been burning under my fingernails for a while) The FreeBSD binaries (as on the ISO image) - are they compiled with gcc or something else. The reason why I ask: Maybe the binaries would be better optimized than if I compiled it myself. On the other hand, I can run the optimizations specifically for my machine, so if gcc is used for the binaries, then I'd be better off like this. Thanks, Raoul To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B8D833F.EA5C1E1F>