Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 31 May 2001 17:18:43 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Joe Clarke <marcus@miami.edu>
To:        Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: bad cookie
Message-ID:  <Pine.OSF.4.31.0105311716210.31369-100000@jaguar.ir.miami.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20010530113647.E91086@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

I get this message from time to time on my FreeBSD NFS client.  I have a
very similar setup to yours.  I found that this message is ignorable,
though not something to cheer about.  Someone pointed out that it could be
a bad NIC or bad network device.  I'm running with a fxp on the client and
a dc on the server.  My switches are Linksys el cheapos.

I also don't use quite so many options in my mount.  I find I get away
with the default NFSv3 UDP just fine.  I get decent performance on my
ports builds.

Joe Clarke

On Wed, 30 May 2001, Stijn Hoop wrote:

> Hi,
>
> What should I do with the following kernel error messages:
>
> got bad cookie vp 0xd19d6bc0 bp 0xc61d72bc
> got bad cookie vp 0xd1480180 bp 0xc616fbec
>
> After grepping the source, I discovered that this was an NFS problem
> (it's not really obvious from the message, is it?). I have two
> machines involved, no more, with
>
> server: FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE #0: Mon Apr 23 13:04:32 CEST 2001
>
> handstarted with
> # /usr/sbin/portmap
> # /sbin/mountd -r
> # /sbin/nfsd -u -t -n 4
>
> client: FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE #0: Wed May 16 04:41:06 CEST 2001
>
> handstarted with
> # /sbin/nfsiod -n 4
> # sysctl -w vfs.nfs.access_cache_timeout=2
>
> (both sequences taken from /etc/rc.network - no /etc/rc.d/nfs.sh start
> unfortunately :( )
>
> I then mounted with:
>
> mount -t nfs -o nfsv3,tcp,intr,rdirplus,-r=32768,-w=32768 server:/path /mnt
>
> Both machines have a 3com 905 ethernetcard (xl0), are on the same
> 100mbit switch, and are running 100baseTX full duplex. The client is
> a faster machine then the server however (P3-933 vs. P2-400).
> Both machines are otherwise very lightly loaded.
>
> Should I loose some options? Should I disregard the message? I think I
> get this message because I'm running an application that accesses
> a lot of files in the same directory. Unfortunately, around the time
> when this message occurs, the application also stops running, with
> the job half done :(
>
> --Stijn
>
> --
> SIGSIG -- signature too long (core dumped)
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
>
>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.4.31.0105311716210.31369-100000>