Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:07:44 -0500 From: Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660? Message-ID: <451C8E00.500@centtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20060928082651.b6xp2ayu9wg40wok@webmail.leidinger.net> References: <451ADC21.50206@centtech.com> <451AE27F.3010506@samsco.org> <200609271727.29775.jhb@freebsd.org> <20060928082651.b6xp2ayu9wg40wok@webmail.leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/28/06 01:26, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> (from Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:27:29 -0400): > >> We've actually moved most of the filesystems into sys/fs in the past. Only >> cd9660, nfs, and ufs are in the top-level. I'd still say leave nfs and ufs >> alone, but sys/isofs/cd9660 -> sys/fs/cd9660 (I wouldn't keep the extra isofs >> directory) probably wouldn't be but so painful at this point. > > I expect a lot of moves when we switch to a VCS where moves are > cheap... but on the other hand, maybe this is another bikeshed. > > Bye, > Alexander. > When is that supposed to happen? Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?451C8E00.500>