Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:40:49 -0500 From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> To: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Postfix and faststart Message-ID: <A9FA0EEE-AE15-4882-8293-E65CB8FE7D06@khera.org> In-Reply-To: <43C0C6BB.1000403@FreeBSD.org> References: <43BD2794.8020000@cnptia.embrapa.br> <43C01C75.6020504@FreeBSD.org> <43C0652D.90709@FreeBSD.org> <43C066B4.3060505@rogers.com> <43C06A2B.9030603@earthmagic.org> <43C0C6BB.1000403@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Jan 8, 2006, at 3:00 AM, Doug Barton wrote: > This idea has been discussed in the past, and it has a lot of > merit. I tend to have a fundamental opposition to adding new pseudo- > targets unless they are ABSOLUTELY necessary, since they add > complexity to the system and reduce flexibility with ordering. > However, this may actually be a case where it's both useful and > worth the cost. It would certainly get rid of the need for naming the startup scripts like 000.foo.sh to force it to happen.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A9FA0EEE-AE15-4882-8293-E65CB8FE7D06>