Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 01:08:24 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com> Cc: peter@wemm.org, tjr@FreeBSD.ORG, sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, phk@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Who broke sort(1) ? Message-ID: <20020924210822.GA61277@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <200209242059.NAA26625@windsor.research.att.com> References: <200209242043.NAA26380@windsor.research.att.com> <20020924205250.GC60957@nagual.pp.ru> <200209242059.NAA26625@windsor.research.att.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 13:59:02 -0700, Bill Fenner wrote: > > >Please, no. They do the right thing. > > I guess there are varying definitions of what the right thing is. I mean just: 1) We all agree targeting POSIX, so POSIX conformance is the right thing. 2) If we use _POSIX2_VERSION 2001* in our headers, we target this POSIX level where +N is clearly dropped (and was as 'depricated' long time). > I don't think it's widely known that the +/- syntax was obsoleted. It was known about 10 years, but not widely. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020924210822.GA61277>