Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 04:00:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Ask Bjoern Hansen <ask@develooper.com> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: i386/30580: named crashes on 4.4-PRERELEASE Message-ID: <200109241100.f8OB0D939264@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR i386/30580; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Ask Bjoern Hansen <ask@develooper.com>
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc: <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>, Dima Ruban <dima@rdy.com>
Subject: Re: i386/30580: named crashes on 4.4-PRERELEASE
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 03:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > >=20
> > > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 05:21:24PM -0700, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It's both running as a (somewhat busy) authoritative server and as a =
> > (very very low traffic) resolving server.
> > > > > >How-To-Repeat:
> > > > > I start the named and wait a few hours or half a day and I'll have a =
> > new core file. :-)
> > > >
> > > > This is usually due to problems with your system clock.
> > >=20
> > > As in the clock keeping track of the time of day? That sounds really
> > > odd. I searched the mail archives for more references about this,
> > > but didn't find anything. Can you point me in the right direction?
> >
> > Search the -security mailing list for "named assertion failed". Since
> > you didn't post the actual error message it's hard to verify it's the
> > same thing.
> >
> > > I've recently had problems with the IDE (don't ask) drive and
> > > haven't had time to replace it yet; could that be related?
> >
> > I haven't heard of that, but it's not impossible.
>
> Did you follow this up yet?
no; I was actually just going to do so to tell that it seems
resolved. I replaced the faulty drive and it had not crashed since
(and actually it took a break in the last few days before I replaced
it).
Anyway, it crashed again:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x28118764 in kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.4
#1 0x281547b6 in abort () from /usr/lib/libc.so.4
#2 0x807456d in ns_panic (category=18, dump_core=1,
format=0x80b7e62 "%s:%d: %s(%s)%s%s failed.")
at /usr/src/usr.sbin/named/../../contrib/bind/bin/named/ns_glue.c:176
#3 0x80745e7 in ns_assertion_failed (
file=0x80b1da0 "/usr/src/usr.sbin/named/../../contrib/bind/bin/named/ns_main.c", line=552, type=assert_insist, cond=0x80b1f3b "errno == EINTR",
print_errno=1)
at /usr/src/usr.sbin/named/../../contrib/bind/bin/named/ns_glue.c:185
#4 0x805fcc3 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfbffde0, envp=0xbfbffde4)
at /usr/src/usr.sbin/named/../../contrib/bind/bin/named/ns_main.c:552
from syslog:
Sep 23 06:59:12 miette named[201]: /usr/src/usr.sbin/named/../../contrib/bind/bin/named/ns_main. c:552: INSIST(errno == EINTR): Invalid argument failed.
Sep 23 06:59:12 miette named[201]: /usr/src/usr.sbin/named/../../contrib/bind/bin/named/ns_main. c:552: INSIST(errno == EINTR): Invalid argument failed.
Sep 23 06:59:14 miette /kernel: pid 201 (named), uid 0: exited on signal 6 (core dumped)
There are no other messages around the same time. No funny hardware
issues and the box is using NTP and I haven't seen any messages from
ntpd about funny things going on with the time on the box. (Which was
what the archived messages about the named assertion failure
indicated). :-/
Any clues would be most appreciated.
- ask
--
ask bjoern hansen, http://ask.netcetera.dk/ !try; do();
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200109241100.f8OB0D939264>