Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 21:13:14 +0200 (EET) From: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee> To: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Project status Message-ID: <20030205211208.K43637-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee> In-Reply-To: <20030205195906.10a7a6fa.flynn@energyhq.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Miguel Mendez wrote: > On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 20:29:48 +0200 (EET) > Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee> wrote: > > Hi, > > > Linux/*BSD are just a cycle behind Solaris in this area. Ultimately > > the cycles don't matter, what matters is the perfomance and > > capabilities you deliver. > > Bzzzt. Take your time to study both KSE and nathanw_sa (NetBSD's). Both > implement N:M threading models. Also, nobody cares about Loonix :-P > Did you actually read the bit I was replying to ? FreeBSD/NetBSD/Linux are moving to a N:M model. Solaris is moving *back* to 1:1 model. > Cheers, > -- > Miguel Mendez - flynn@energyhq.homeip.net > GPG Public Key :: http://energyhq.homeip.net/files/pubkey.txt > EnergyHQ :: http://www.energyhq.tk > Of course it runs NetBSD! > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030205211208.K43637-100000>