Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 23:39:19 +0100 From: Nik Clayton <nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk> To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@hub.freebsd.org> Cc: nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk, chris@calldei.com, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG, core@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2 new mailing lists: policy and ipfw Message-ID: <19990705233919.P71138@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> In-Reply-To: <19990705003013.1551B14F2E@hub.freebsd.org>; from Jonathan M. Bresler on Sun, Jul 04, 1999 at 05:30:13PM -0700 References: <19990704210245.L71138@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> <19990705003013.1551B14F2E@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jul 04, 1999 at 05:30:13PM -0700, Jonathan M. Bresler wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 21:02:45 +0100
> > From: Nik Clayton <nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk>
> > I'm adding them now. Core, why do we need "freebsd-policy"? Isn't
> > that role also covered by freebsd-announce?
>
> at Usenix core specifically expressed the desire for a mailing
> list, other than announce, which will carry all core decisions. it
> has happened that people have mistaken statements by one member of
> core for statements by the Core Team.
>
> If it did not appear in freebsd-policy, it aint freebsd
> policy. this email excepted? ;P
Fair enough. If someone's already subscribed to -announce should they
subscribe to -policy as well, or will all -policy messages be cc'd to
-announce?
N
--
[intentional self-reference] can be easily accommodated using a blessed,
non-self-referential dummy head-node whose own object destructor severs
the links.
-- Tom Christiansen in <375143b5@cs.colorado.edu>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990705233919.P71138>