Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 17:44:00 +0600 (ESS) From: Andrey Zakhvatov <andy@cgu.chel.su> To: imura@FreeBSD.org (R. Imura) Cc: asami@FreeBSD.org, andy@cgu.chel.su, cpiazza@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/qt2 - Imported sources Message-ID: <199909191144.RAA06647@mail.cgu.chel.su> In-Reply-To: <19990919174041U.imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> from "R. Imura" at "Sep 19, 99 05:40:41 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello,
> I have one question.
> Why /usr/X11R6/include/X11 exists?
For historical reasons (and I think it's Right Thing) all X system includes
goes to include/X11 and applications use #include <X11/*.h>
Third party applications must use include/app/ or include/, so we just
-I${X11BASE}/include -I${X11BASE}/include/app.
Qt applications use #include <qt.h>.
At my POV, for example, KDE must use include/kde and not install include
files directly in ${PREFIX}/include.
And another question: Should we _strongly_ push X applications to use
${LOCALBASE} as ${PREFIX}, leave ${X11BASE} for only X11 system staff?
I prefer using ${X11BASE} as ${PREFIX} for _all_ X related applications, but..
What your opinions?
Sincerely yours, Andy
--
Tel: +7-(3512)-38-39-73, E-mail: andy@icc.surw.chel.su
WWW: http://surw.chel.su/~andy/index.html, ICQ:10705306
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199909191144.RAA06647>