Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:43:24 +0100 From: Christoph Mallon <christoph.mallon@gmx.de> To: FuLLBLaSTstorm <fullblaststorm@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler?) Message-ID: <496F2F6C.4010708@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <6c51dbb10901150344s409cd834p3cd8fae189e42a68@mail.gmail.com> References: <de2964020901141507m5a30c466ta1e05694d220ce0b@mail.gmail.com> <20090115084515.GA91157@freebsd.org> <496F0D1D.7080505@andric.com> <6c51dbb10901150344s409cd834p3cd8fae189e42a68@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
FuLLBLaSTstorm schrieb: > On 2009-01-15 09:45, Roman Divacky wrote: >> I really dont see any reason why there must be only ONE compiler that >> can be used to compile FreeBSD. > > I fully agree with it, too. Why not to put something like > OPTION_COMPILER=`gcc|clang|llvm' so every portion of system designed > for particular compiler could use the right one? I don't even want to imagine the maintainance nightmare.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?496F2F6C.4010708>