Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:04:57 +0300 From: Aleksandr Rybalko <ray@ddteam.net> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: Aleksandr Rybalko <ray@dlink.ua>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SPI rework Message-ID: <20111020000457.ad225dcc.ray@ddteam.net> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmonQymmupm=B6Rp-MckG-v%2B=CwrtqKagTDn-UymFHnMVcw@mail.gmail.com> References: <20111017194940.ed720115.ray@ddteam.net> <CAJ-VmomDTtnUROGbhDN9DDev0PWdt5HdbZifRvLC6ua8AC7%2BFw@mail.gmail.com> <20111018121540.a402040e.ray@dlink.ua> <CAJ-VmonQymmupm=B6Rp-MckG-v%2B=CwrtqKagTDn-UymFHnMVcw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:14:07 +0800 Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > .. what's wrong with your first suggestion? I liked it. :) > > > Adrian Because we can't do duplex operations in that way. But if we use old struct, we will be able send and receive in the same time. I don't know if such device exists. But if we implement "SPI device" then we will be able to communicate between two FreeBSD boxes in a duplex manner! :) -- Aleksandr Rybalko <ray@ddteam.net>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111020000457.ad225dcc.ray>