Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 19:12:20 -0700 From: Adam Weinberger <adam@vectors.cx> To: ports@freebsd.org Cc: Hendrik Scholz <hendrik@scholz.net> Subject: fluxbox-devel's install dir Message-ID: <20030602021220.GG222@vectors.cx>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 So a PR has been submitted -- and a repocopy approved -- for the creation of x11-wm/fluxbox-devel. My question here is: should the port install over fluxbox, or into a separate directory? It's very easy to make the -devel port tack "-devel" onto the end of binary names and onto the sharedir dirname, and it works flawlessly in that regard. Should the port install into a separate directory, with unique binary names? Or is it OK for it to use the same (familiar) filenames as in the x11-wm/fluxbox port? I haven't heard back from the submitter since the PR was submitted. More info at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/52542 # Adam - -- Adam Weinberger vectors.cx >> adam@vectors.cx FreeBSD.org << adamw@FreeBSD.ORG #vim:set ts=8: 8-char tabs prevent tooth decay. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+2rKEo8KM2ULHQ/0RAp76AJ9AhCwD00Orkpweac8ejTFu9WzKMACgvSP9 R8EU+MGoXmpYw9BlCy/ALH4= =gao+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030602021220.GG222>