Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 00:29:45 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet in_pcb.c tcp_subr.c tcp_timer.c tcp_var.h Message-ID: <20060907202945.GE40020@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <450067BB.3080501@elischer.org> References: <200609061356.k86DuZ0w016069@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060906091204.B6691@odysseus.silby.com> <20060906143204.GQ40020@FreeBSD.org> <20060906093553.L6691@odysseus.silby.com> <20060906150129.GT40020@FreeBSD.org> <20060907000939.J12826@odysseus.silby.com> <450067BB.3080501@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 11:40:59AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: J> If we are seeing less than stellar TCP performance on a loaded 6.1 machine J> will this change possibly fix it (was faster under 4.8).? J> J> when will the MFC occur? If you mean that bulk session is slower, than this is not the case. If you mean that the box behaves laggy under high TCP load (a lot of sessions), than this is probably the case. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060907202945.GE40020>