Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 11:16:42 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Steve Ames <steve@energistic.com> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, kwm@FreeBSD.org, Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/pwlib Makefile distinfo ports/devel/pwlib/files patch-make-common.mak patch-src-ptclib-ansper.cxx patch-src::ptclib::asner.cxx patch-unix Message-ID: <20050612111642.28d2bd44@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20050611232456.GA66377@energistic.com> References: <200506102129.j5ALTpva002478@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050611142832.5b7bd10f@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20050611232456.GA66377@energistic.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 18:24:56 -0500 Steve Ames <steve@energistic.com> wrote: > > So in case someone want's to look at it, the patches are at > > http://www.leidinger.net/FreeBSD/port-patches/ > > Brutal. I was just starting the same task actually. However I also came > to the conclusion that just updating the port to the latest stable > versions would break a number of applications (primarily asterisk) so > I was going the way of other ports and putting in versions: [...] > The Mimas release (updated version of Pandora so everything that works with > Pandora should work with Mimas in which case the Pandora release can be > skipped entirely): > > pwlib18 (1.8.4) > openh323-115 (1.15.3) > > Clearly from a ports perspective if all pwlib/openh323 dependant applications > can be tested and fixed to work with the Mimas release then we should update > straight to it and skip all of this versioning stuff... at the same time > committing whatever patches are required to make the applications work and > moving from the current statically compiled openh323/pwlib to shared libs. That's what I had in mind to do... > The patches on your website are from today so I assume your actively > working on this? If so I will provide you with whatever assistance you I've transferred them from my laptop with a broken NIC (and no time to take care of it) to my desktop. I did the work 2 weeks ago, and it seems I'm not able to look at gnomemeeting for at least another week (<insert rant about buying an used car and being confronted with a broken gearbox after 1.5 months here>). > need in making sure that applications compile and work. If not I'll > look at your patches and perhaps use them as a basis for moving forward? At least the pwlib and openh323 ports look sane to me. At least they compile and install just fine. kwm@ has some patches for gnomemeeting, but so far he hasn't told me that it works just fine. So somewhere may be a bug or two. I suggest to start with my patches of pwlib and openh323 to try to get gnomemeeting working. And maybe you have some time to look at the TODO list in the open323 port (nothing major, but when gnomemeeting runs we want to add the last missing pieces to openh323)... Bye, Alexander. -- It's not a bug, it's tradition! http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050612111642.28d2bd44>