Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 09:10:56 -0500 From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> To: Bas Smeelen <b.smeelen@ose.nl> Cc: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Adam Strohl <adams-freebsd@ateamsystems.com> Subject: Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO Message-ID: <20121103091056.00004eb9@unknown> In-Reply-To: <50944597.9090709@ose.nl> References: <5093F934.7050306@ose.nl> <5093FD3D.3080201@ateamsystems.com> <Pine.GSO.4.64.1211021742410.15219@sea.ntplx.net> <50944597.9090709@ose.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 23:13:43 +0100 Bas Smeelen <b.smeelen@ose.nl> wrote: > I have submitted a PR with patch, see how it goes > Cheers Why aren't we patching the dump utility to error/exit saying it's not compatible with SUJ at this time? Update the descriptions in the installer, but leave SUJ as default and patch dump.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121103091056.00004eb9>