Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 11:30:44 +0100 From: dick hoogendijk <dick@nagual.st> To: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Clone FreeBSD Partition Message-ID: <20021215103044.GA18795@nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <200212142217.gBEMHkEq014939@peedub.jennejohn.org> References: <20021214124320.GA15363@nagual.st> <200212142217.gBEMHkEq014939@peedub.jennejohn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Dec 14 Gary wrote: > dick hoogendijk writes: >> What's the (dis)advantage of inode-per-inode cloning? > I just made the comment re: inode-per-inode because AFAIK that's the > way dump/restore will work. Ok w/ me. Don't know too much the ins-and-outs of backup progs yet, so I was (am) curious about the (dis)advantages of the most well-known-ones. People always mention dump/restore.. > I'm not aware of an advantage or disadvantage to using dump/restore > (except for restoring from tape) Hmmm, I don't have a tape-unit unfortunately. Always clone to another harddive. Not quite sure what you mean right here. > but thought that cpdup might be easier to understand and use. This is absolutely true afaik. Cpdub is a very nice program and very easy to handle. -- dick -- http://www.nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.7 ++ Debian GNU/Linux (Woody) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021215103044.GA18795>