Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 07:08:59 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 283400] if_bridge(4) contains false statement about link address selection Message-ID: <bug-283400-9-ZyhZsfc2yi@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-283400-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283400 --- Comment #6 from Martin Birgmeier <d8zNeCFG@aon.at> --- To make it perfectly clear, you might want to replace "in the range reserved for universally administered addresses" by "in the range of universally administered addresses reserved for the FreeBSD Foundation" Since the Foundation got a full MA-L block (see also https://regauth.standards.ieee.org/standards-ra-web/pub/view.html), the -10 seems to be internally administrated within the Foundation. I am wondering whether they have some kind of registration authority where this is assigned, and whether that would be publicly viewable somewhere. Just to make sure, does the new wording reflect what is in the code? I mean, is it really coded as mentioned by Zhenlei Huang in comment 1? -- Martin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-283400-9-ZyhZsfc2yi>