Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 16:27:15 +0200 From: "Raphael H. Becker" <rabe@p-i-n.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devfs ruleset 4 (jails) Message-ID: <20060405162714.L60206@p-i-n.com> In-Reply-To: <200603291154.18847.jhb@freebsd.org>; from jhb@freebsd.org on Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 11:54:17AM -0500 References: <20060327093503.G60206@p-i-n.com> <20060329180704.I60206@p-i-n.com> <20060329183259.J60206@p-i-n.com> <200603291154.18847.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 11:54:17AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday 29 March 2006 11:32, Raphael H. Becker wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 06:07:05PM +0200, Raphael H. Becker wrote: > > > PS: the box crashed just while writing this (while using devfs > > > <something>) so I'll need to powercycle it before leaving my office. > > crash: [...] > > I don't know much about the debugger, so I just resetted the box by > > typing "reset" at the prompt. > > Hope that helps a little. > Well, it means that it's broken in HEAD as well at least. Is there a workaround to hide "critical" devices from a mounted devfs? ... any patches to test? >From my point of view this is a critical situation for machines with jails and "foreign" roots in them while I (host admin) cannot hide disk devices (and other critical stuff) from the jails. Regrads Raphael Becker
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060405162714.L60206>