Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 20:01:41 +0200 From: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org> To: Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 12.1p7 no longer boots after doing zpool upgrade -a Message-ID: <20200713180141.GA21770@gvr.gvr.org> In-Reply-To: <CACNAnaFEcHMcsePVsbKizHv3OKT%2B1qrDhtupQXD=BB%2BbZF7UaQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <20200709131201.GA3464@co.gvr.org> <CACNAnaGbCknS18yLv1ow2FFnj5xSMHXQZgxfRPMUMTb5ujB=fw@mail.gmail.com> <20200710182903.GA7412@gvr.gvr.org> <20200710184446.GA8358@gvr.gvr.org> <CACNAnaFEcHMcsePVsbKizHv3OKT%2B1qrDhtupQXD=BB%2BbZF7UaQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 02:28:12PM -0500, Kyle Evans wrote: > > > > There was one question I forgot to ask: > > Could I have known that my method of updating the ESP was not correct? > > If so, where is this documented? > > > > It is probably unlikely, to be honest. I don't know that we do a good > job of advising people/documenting how to update the ESP. In fact, I > have no idea where any of it's documented except the wiki: > https://wiki.freebsd.org/UEFI > Hi Kyle, I think that if the "new" method is stable as you say, the changes done in r342283 based on https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17947 should be MFC'ed, don't you think? Because then boot1.efi and boot1.efifat wil not even be created anymore and the old documentation would be clearly out of date (in fact it would even be better when both boot1.efi and boot1.efifat would be mentioned in ObsoleteFiles.inc) -Guido
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200713180141.GA21770>