Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 04:58:17 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <egrosbein@rdtc.ru> To: Florian Smeets <flo@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/160273 and ports/160272 Message-ID: <4E7517F9.4070908@rdtc.ru> In-Reply-To: <4E751534.8070307@grosbein.pp.ru> References: <201109172033.p8HKXqm8056115@freefall.freebsd.org> <4E7512C1.2040400@FreeBSD.org> <4E751534.8070307@grosbein.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
18.09.2011 04:46, Eugene Grosbein пишет: > 18.09.2011 04:36, Florian Smeets пишет: >> Hi, >> >> now that AquaGatekeeper2 has been removed, do we still need AquaGatekeeper? >> >> I'm currently usure what to do with these PRs. > > I don't get why AquaGatekeeper2 in spite of PR fixing it: I don't get why AquaGatekeeper2 has been removed. > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/160273 > > That was mistake and it should be revived and fixed with the patch from the PR. > > Eugene Grosbein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E7517F9.4070908>