Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 13:43:56 +1030 From: Shane Ambler <FreeBSD@ShaneWare.Biz> To: scheidell@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/163933: Update security/zenmap to same vers as nmap Message-ID: <4F4068F4.5060109@ShaneWare.Biz> In-Reply-To: <201201082343.q08NhlVA081796@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201201082343.q08NhlVA081796@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/01/2012 10:13, scheidell@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Synopsis: Update security/zenmap to same vers as nmap > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: scheidell > State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 8 23:42:16 UTC 2012 > State-Changed-Why: > This port has no official maintainer. > If you would take over maintance of this port, someone will commit your patches. > (ports without official maintainers tend to be ignored, and eventually dropped) > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=163933 > My first opinion is that security/zenmap uses the same tarball as security/nmap to install python files for a gui that nmap skips and that the two should be maintained by the same person. My second thought is that zenmap should probably be made into a slave of nmap as that may make it easier. Having said that - I plan on helping with ports and will adopt zenmap if needed as I think it should be kept available. -- Shane Ambler FreeBSD (at) ShaneWare (dot) Biz http://ShaneWare.Biz
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F4068F4.5060109>