Date: 04 Apr 2000 17:59:43 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, chris@calldei.com, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposal: Union mount of fdesc on top of /dev Message-ID: <xzpzor9rh5c.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Poul-Henning Kamp's message of "Tue, 04 Apr 2000 17:56:51 %2B0200" References: <27929.954863811@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> writes:
> In message <xzp8zytsvyj.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
> > Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> writes:
> > > The other downside is that, unlike devfs contents, they'll get
> > > just as stale just as fast as /dev gets out of date with the
> > > currently running kernel and/or MAKEDEV.
> > You expect the major/minor numbers for std{in,out,err} to change in
> > the foreseeable future?
> Uhm, why would they change ? They are just aliases for /dev/fd/[0-2]
> after all...
My point precisely. I got the impression that Terry was afraid they
might get stale.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpzor9rh5c.fsf>