Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:55:48 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> To: Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@FreeBSD.org> Cc: python@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS Message-ID: <20090710145547.GE86673@droso.net> In-Reply-To: <1e39c0a90907091948i5b11a4fdrb0d75cd08f245eac@mail.gmail.com> References: <200907091332.n69DWgXF055913@pointyhat.freebsd.org> <1e39c0a90907091948i5b11a4fdrb0d75cd08f245eac@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:48:41AM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 21:32, Erwin Lansing<erwin@freebsd.org> wrote: > > LATEST_LINK PORTNAME MAINTAINER > > ========================================================================== > > py25-bsddb databases/py-bsddb perky@FreeBSD.org > > py25-bsddb databases/py25-bsddb python@FreeBSD.org > > I think these two are not an issue. Default Python version is switched to 2.6. > > But how this report generated? Switching happened before > databases/py25-bsddb repocpoied. > The script is in Tools/scripts/check-latest-link. Could this be caused by the installed python version on the system it runs on? -erwin -- Erwin Lansing (o_ _o) http://droso.org \\\_\ /_/// The rest is silence <____) (____> erwin@lansing.dk [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFKV1Zzqy9aWxUlaZARAnX0AJ4+ixIngJ1fPIso5w+WUcnQv4VN3wCgySHZ NoS7pT2+O2ihNfTKQ8dOk6U= =HmZe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090710145547.GE86673>