Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 23:05:13 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: David O'Brien <dev-null@NUXI.com>, FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: -current results (was something funny with soft updates?) Message-ID: <3D229419.72C317C0@mindspring.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0206281233500.75410-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <200207020314.g623Eke5038019@apollo.backplane.com> <20020702164756.E70767@dragon.nuxi.com> <200207030106.g6316Rwp008905@apollo.backplane.com> <20020702182303.A94386@dragon.nuxi.com> <200207030601.g6361E5E010289@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Dillon wrote: > I get just about the same performance for GCC2 as I do for GCC3 in > the tests I've run so far. It makes me wonder what the hell GCC3 is > burning all that cpu *on*. SETI @ Home? 8-). -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D229419.72C317C0>