Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 4 Apr 2017 21:21:08 -0500
From:      Pedro Giffuni <pfg@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Kyle Evans <kevans91@ksu.edu>
Cc:        "Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya)" <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>, Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r316492 - in head/usr.bin/grep: . regex
Message-ID:  <25D20383-8A5B-4F78-B8B4-12F9B3521626@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <CACNAnaFPoj8d=DpEbeyNj9ECGzuVRWo4S-HR7%2BDyB74HACoF=g@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201704041608.v34G8qSo055328@repo.freebsd.org> <4D675D2F-7D6F-4AF2-AE10-5DF19D4158D0@gmail.com> <B9C5AC3B-1775-4D5D-ADA7-C6CE091F32F5@FreeBSD.org> <CAG6CVpVQ1pFdeCg-OJNGcGd1rbJ1CMDEyfEa3FWd9HEsrSfrUw@mail.gmail.com> <2CA2F0F0-17E4-4E9F-BDD6-10EDFECDB679@gmail.com> <CACNAnaFPoj8d=DpEbeyNj9ECGzuVRWo4S-HR7%2BDyB74HACoF=g@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> On Apr 4, 2017, at 14:48, Kyle Evans <kevans91@ksu.edu> wrote:
>=20
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya) =
<yaneurabeya@gmail.com <mailto:yaneurabeya@gmail.com>> wrote:
>=20
> > On Apr 4, 2017, at 12:04, Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org =
<mailto:cem@freebsd.org>> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org =
<mailto:dim@freebsd.org>> wrote:
> >> On 4 Apr 2017, at 19:14, Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya) =
<yaneurabeya@gmail.com <mailto:yaneurabeya@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>> Where did xmalloc.c originate from?
> >>
> >> GNU.
> >
> > I believe this to be completely incorrect.
> >
> >> Almost all software from the GNU project relies on malloc wrappers
> >> which abort the program on allocation failures.
> >
> > That is not what bsdgrep's xmalloc() did, if you read the code. It
> > simply tracks all allocations for basic leak analysis.
> >
> > Abort on allocation failure would be a perfectly reasonable behavior
> > for bsdgrep(1), too.
>=20
> There are multiple, competing definitions floating around the =
internet. I was genuinely curious where this variant came from because I =
wanted to make sure we weren=E2=80=99t just zapping a file that some =
upstream uses somewhere, in the event we were going to bring down =
further updates, again, from said upstream source.
>=20
> FWIW- I did scour the internet for other bsdgrep implementations and =
did not find a trace of this in any of the others that I found, to =
include the OS X implementation. In fact, as I recall, most of them =
didn't even have the regex/ bits that we do, presumably they were using =
regex(3) but it's been a while since I was poking around.

Well, for the history of bsdgrep, you have to go back to freegrep:

https://jameshoward.us/software/freegrep/ =
<https://jameshoward.us/software/freegrep/>;

but the most significant changes are likely to be due to Gabor:

https://wiki.freebsd.org/BSDgrep <https://wiki.freebsd.org/BSDgrep>;

Pedro.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?25D20383-8A5B-4F78-B8B4-12F9B3521626>