Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 21:39:01 +0400 (MSD) From: Chagin Dmitry <chagin.dmitry@gmail.com> To: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, Chagin Dmitry <chagin.dmitry@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.1.10.0805211216580.5183@ora.chd.net> In-Reply-To: <20080521080422.GA69849@freebsd.org> References: <200805191106.m4JB6oBF011533@freefall.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.1.10.0805210101470.4552@ora.chd.net> <20080521080422.GA69849@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 21 May 2008, Roman Divacky wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 01:09:17AM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote: >> On Mon, 19 May 2008, FreeBSD bugmaster wrote: >> >> >Current FreeBSD problem reports >> >Critical problems >> >Serious problems >> > >> >S Tracker Resp. Description >> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >o kern/21463 emulation [linux] Linux compatability mode should not >> >allow setu >> >o kern/97326 emulation [linux] file descriptor leakage in linux >> >emulation >> >o kern/117010 emulation [linux] linux_getdents() get something like >> >buffer ove >> > >> >> about 117010... >> Can somebody test this patch on amd64 and i386? >> It is necessary linux_base-f8, 2.6.16, -current. > > can you describe the idea behind the patch? why do you think > it's correct to replace fcntl64 with fcntl args? > this diff from linux64 port, therefore in it a lot of not concerning to getdents(), but it will not prevent test fcntl64 with fcntl have identical args in linux, but linux x86-64 has no fcntl64 syscall to getdents concerns only changes of ino member of struct l_dirent, essence in that i too had problem with getdents. and i have not understood after what changes it have worked correctly. it disturbs me. -- Have fun! chd
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.1.10.0805211216580.5183>