Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 30 Apr 2016 12:56:54 +0700
From:      Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
To:        Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com>, Charles Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
Cc:        freebsd-security <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-16:16.ntp
Message-ID:  <57244926.9000907@grosbein.net>
In-Reply-To: <201604300045.u3U0icQk037159@hz.grosbein.net>
References:  <20160429082953.DB31D1769@freefall.freebsd.org> <9e6342a420259fec7bd21d6222cc6e05@zahemszky.hu> <1461929003.67736.2.camel@yandex.com> <CINIP100NTSBSRqf69a0000002a@cinip100ntsbs.irtnog.net> <BABF8C57A778F04791343E5601659908237051@cinip100ntsbs.irtnog.net> <0O6F002Z65WLUS40@mr28p00im-smtpin028.me.com> <28698FCA-CEAB-4A0F-9F12-57FCCD871E1E@mac.com> <201604300045.u3U0icQk037159@hz.grosbein.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
30.04.2016 7:44, Roger Marquis пишет:

> Are you seriously proposing that most FreeBSD installations need to
> serve as timeservers?

Absolutely. Every LAN router should be capable in supplying NTP service
for its LAN clients, it just needs a way to differentiate its LAN/WAN interfaces
(security zones) to prevent abuse from outer interfaces.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?57244926.9000907>