Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:10:00 +0400 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660? Message-ID: <20060929081000.GB86237@rambler-co.ru> In-Reply-To: <451CA64D.3050703@samsco.org> References: <451ADC21.50206@centtech.com> <451AE27F.3010506@samsco.org> <200609271727.29775.jhb@freebsd.org> <20060928082651.b6xp2ayu9wg40wok@webmail.leidinger.net> <451CA64D.3050703@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:51:25PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: [...] > Moves in CVS are relatively easy too, it's just that they can only > be performed by a special group of people, and that special group > rarely responds to requests. So, it's a policy problem, not a > technology problem. I would imagine than any new VCS that the project > adopts would have similar policies in place, and moves will still be > impossible. >=20 Why? For example with P4, branching saves all of the history, so everyone can do a move without loosing the history (the reason why we have invented the repocopy procedure for CVS). I cannot speak for other VCS'es. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFHNTYqRfpzJluFF4RAubIAJ9+zKe8hH5c7kO4XySzAFo6vUKoegCdHsdF JMBGbIx8LAkdDwAWD44kRyY= =qByC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060929081000.GB86237>