Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 14:49:01 -0800 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@freebsd.org> To: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> Cc: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai@bart.nl>, Jim Mock <jim@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO_8859-1/books/handbook/l10n chapter.sgml Message-ID: <20000310144901.C84261@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20000310173347.Z25438@jade.chc-chimes.com>; from billf@chc-chimes.com on Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 05:33:47PM -0500 References: <200003101656.IAA84311@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000310123724.A1210@luna.cdrom.com> <20000310135743.A75653@freebsd.org> <20000310230855.C5123@lucifer.bart.nl> <20000310142317.A84261@freebsd.org> <20000310173347.Z25438@jade.chc-chimes.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 05:33:47PM -0500, Bill Fumerola wrote: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 02:23:17PM -0800, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > > > 3) I start fixing process and ask Alexey (as regular -doc commiter) > > in private mail to review/fix my changes after I commit them. > > If we all operated like this, we'd never have a working system. It depends of broken/unbroken timing intervals relation. I not consider docs as critical area must stay all the time unbroken, and treat few hours breakage as acceptable one. May I was wrong in such consideration, but things which give me that idea was: 1) Unacceptable l10n chapter stays for long time and nobody cries (until Alexey pointing me there). 2) FreeBSD www update period ( > 48h ) -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> http://nagual.pp.ru/~ache/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000310144901.C84261>