Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 15:45:53 +1000 From: Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> To: Gregory Orange <gregory.orange@calorieking.com>, ohauer@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mail/postfix default build options request: SASL Message-ID: <559B6791.7050407@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <559B643F.3060409@calorieking.com> References: <559B643F.3060409@calorieking.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/07/2015 3:31 PM, Gregory Orange wrote: > Hi Olli and ports@, > > I don't know if this is a helpful forum to raise it, but I would like to > request that SASL be enabled in the default build options for > mail/postfix. I am attempting to use binary-only packages wherever > possible, and so far this is the first where I currently have to build > it myself. > > I would have thought SASL is in use across many Postfix installations, > but of course I could be wrong. I was tempted to try out > SMTP-after-IMAP, but since Postfix has the support, I think SASL is far > cleaner. > > Would any responders please include me in the CC? I am not subscribed to > the list. > > Thanks, > Greg. > If consensus can't be achieved or there is a good reason not to enable this by default, then postfix-sasl as a slave port may be a desirable alternative, which I believe has existed in the past. I'm generally: +1 on security related options enabled by default +1 on OPTIONS_DEFAULT matching upstream defaults -1 on OPTIONS_DEFAULT introducing large dependency sets ./koobs
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?559B6791.7050407>