Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:18:41 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More on MySQL -- Fatal trap 12 Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10402181015560.5778-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <40330E09.9090900@he.iki.fi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Petri Helenius wrote: > Daniel Eischen wrote: >=20 > >Oh, I assumed you guys were tracking -current, not sticking with > >the last release... > > > > =20 > > > I could to that on the test boxes but I=B4m also trying to figure out if = I=20 > could switch from linuxthreads to kse in production stuff. After I=B4m=20 > convinced that can be done, I have more load to put on the -CURRENT=20 > boxes. It would be kind of scary to run current "for real" :). >=20 > How large the differences are between RELENG_5_2 and HEAD ? (I could=20 > look in cvs but it probably does not give the right picture) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/libpthread/thread/?sortby= =3Ddate#dirlist Mostly some cancellation cleaups, adding cancellation points for accept() and connect(), deadlock prevention for recursive rwlocks, cancellation points for sem_[try|timed]wait(). --=20 Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10402181015560.5778-100000>