Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 19:47:28 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Gary Kline <kline@thought.org> Cc: Steve Bertrand <steve@ibctech.ca>, madunix <madunix@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Open_Source Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906021946110.2742@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20090602165527.GA23405@thought.org> References: <4d3f56c90906020812t40c5fcbv178bcd7f702356f@mail.gmail.com> <4A2550C1.6060702@ibctech.ca> <20090602165527.GA23405@thought.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The only rationale I've heard for closed source is that somebody could > steal the idea. There will always be both of them. And that's OK as long as you can choose.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0906021946110.2742>