Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 15:25:38 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> Cc: Steve Lewis <nepolon@systray.com>, "James E. Pace" <jepace@pobox.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Scaling Apache? Message-ID: <20000828152538.F18862@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <200008282218.SAA09245@devsys.jaguNET.com>; from jim@jaguNET.com on Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 06:18:23PM -0400 References: <20000828140247.A18862@fw.wintelcom.net> <200008282218.SAA09245@devsys.jaguNET.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> [000828 15:18] wrote: > Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > > Apache was never designed to be "the fastest" web server around. > > > We designed it with different groundrules. With 2.0, one major > > > design consideration _was_ performance, and 2.0 does in fact kick > > > some ass and allows preforking, process/thread and "pure thread" > > > operation, which is good to have. > > > > I'll believe it when I see it. > > > > http://apache-two-oh.covalent.net/ This doesn't seem to be under any considerable load. It's a good thing that they're trying this new method, but I'd like to see it deployed on something that shows its performance. Like say... slashdot. :) -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000828152538.F18862>