Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:53:14 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@dimaga.com> Cc: Brian Somers <brian@awfulhak.demon.co.uk>, hackers@freebsd.org, eivind@freebsd.org, bde@zeta.org.au, brian@utell.co.uk Subject: Re: Include files (in ppp) Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.970228094944.7216A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970227142902.00bccd30@dimaga.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
You might want to compare with what's on IIJ's server, ftp.iij.ad.jp. As I recall tony-o wrote IIJ-PPP and he is no longer at IIJ. I haven't been following it so I'm not sure how actively it's maintained. Regards, Mike On Thu, 27 Feb 1997, Eivind Eklund wrote: > At 01:23 AM 2/27/97 +0000, Brian Somers wrote: > >I'd suggest one of the following: > > > >- Leave it as it is (with osreldate.h adding partially to the chaos) > >- Remove all of the #ifs buts and whys (rationalle: If osreldate isn't > > in there, All the #if BSD etc stuff is useless anyway) > > I'd say this depend on a few things: > (A) How many patches to IIJ-PPP do we recieve? If there are a lot of > these, removing #ifdefs might disrupt merging. (Doesn't look like it from > the amount of commits, though.) > (B) Is IIJ-PPP actively developed anywhere outside FreeBSD? See (A). > (PPP+pktAlias doesn't count - I'll merge any changes from -current) > (C) Is IIJ-PPP from FreeBSD actively used by non-FreeBSD people? In this > case, we could pay them the courtesy of leaving it in. > > If none of these factors give us trouble, I'd say we cut the #ifdef's - > they clutter the code. However, the final choice is in Brian's hands - as > well as the responsibility for adding himself as maintainer in the Makefile > ;-) > > > Eivind Eklund perhaps@yes.no http://maybe.yes.no/perhaps/ eivind@freebsd.org >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.95.970228094944.7216A-100000>