Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 19:19:23 +0200 From: Ernst de Haan <ernst@jollem.com> To: Cedric Berger <cedric@wireless-networks.com> Cc: "Koster, K.J." <K.J.Koster@kpn.com>, "'FreeBSD Java mailing list'" <freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Who used jdk 1.1.8 and linux 1.2.2? Message-ID: <20010525191923.A33219@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl> In-Reply-To: <3B0E93D6.3A9B10B6@wireless-networks.com>; from cedric@wireless-networks.com on Fri, May 25, 2001 at 10:18:14AM -0700 References: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E452205FD9C0E@l04.research.kpn.com> <3B0E93D6.3A9B10B6@wireless-networks.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Cedric.
According to the laws of version numbering, 1.3.1 *is* a 1.3 version, and so
is 1.3.0. I assume you are stating that 1.3.0 may not be very useful now that
1.3.1 is out.
Well, I just submitted a diff that will upgrade the java/linux-jdk13 port from
1.3.0_02 to 1.3.1, but I already found that 1.3.1 exposed one problem that
1.3.0_02 did not. A newer version is not always better in all situations.
Ernst
Cedric Berger wrote:
> "Koster, K.J." wrote:
>
> > The usefulness of Linux JDK 1.2.2 is less obvious. Apart from "I haven't had
> > time", what are your reasons not to switch to 1.3? Are there stability
> > issues that keep you from moving to 1.3?
>
> Also: with 1.3.1 out, the usefulness of 1.3 is not very obvious.
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
>
--
Ernst de Haan
Java Architect
Jollem Information Technology
"Come to me all who are weary and burdened
and I will give you rest" -- Jesus Christ
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010525191923.A33219>