Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:09:15 -0700 From: Ben Schumacher <benschumacher@gmail.com> To: Dan Naumov <dan.naumov@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com> Subject: Re: ZFS on top of GELI Message-ID: <9859143f1001111109m7156d92fk9443b347ddb9441a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <cf9b1ee01001111039g21a3c81bja87a8a2825157fae@mail.gmail.com> References: <cf9b1ee01001100708m7851418cmbb77cc3580d0fab3@mail.gmail.com> <E1NUO5m-0001aK-Uk@dilbert.ticketswitch.com> <cf9b1ee01001111039g21a3c81bja87a8a2825157fae@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Dan Naumov <dan.naumov@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Pete French > How fast is the CPU in the system showing no overhead? Having no > noticable overhead whatsoever sounds extremely unlikely unless you are > actually using it on something like a very modern dualcore or better. IIRC, GELI can take advantage of hardware acceleration for encryption, so I'd bet that a slower CPU with hardware crypto (Via Nano, for example) would probably be fast enough too. I've actually got one of these at home, I might have to check this out and see how it runs. Cheers, Ben
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9859143f1001111109m7156d92fk9443b347ddb9441a>