Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 11:38:40 -0800 (PST) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org>, Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r330004 - in head/stand: . arm efi forth i386 mips powerpc sparc64 Message-ID: <201802271938.w1RJcebu016760@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <1613436.oZ5flIo0b9@ralph.baldwin.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 09:28:49 AM Kyle Evans wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 9:16 PM, Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > Author: imp > > > Date: Mon Feb 26 03:16:04 2018 > > > New Revision: 330004 > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/330004 > > > > > > Log: > > > Add NO_OBJ to those directories that don't make anything. > > > > > > For directories that don't many anything, add NO_OBJ=t just before we > > > include bsd.init.mk. This prevents them from creating an OBJ > > > directory. In addition, prevent defs.mk from creating the machine > > > related links in these cases. They aren't needed and break, at least > > > on stable, the read-only src tree build. > > > > > > > Any objection to also removing efi from i386 SUBDIR? It seems silly > > to be explicitly adding it when we know nothing here is applicable and > > it's going to take some amount of work to get there. > > Actually, I believe the only thing it needs is for the i386 kernel to > understand the EFI memory map. If you made the i386 EFI loader fake up the > SMAP metadata from the EFI memory map you could probably boot an unmodified > i386 kernel. (It would be better to teach the i386 kernel to handle the EFI > memory map though.) It's more a matter of does someone care enough to > actually get a test environment going to test it. I may have some of the test pieces in place in the form of ipxe32.efi and network booting. I just cant rember which piece of hardware triggered that path in my configuration, I had to force it to legacy bios mode to get it working. > One would also eventually want to teach the i386 kernel about efifb as well > as EFI runtime services, but that shouldn't be strictly required for booting > an i386 kernel via EFI. How much of that could be done in bhyve with a different compile of edk2? -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201802271938.w1RJcebu016760>