Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 12:05:03 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ia_netbroadcast Message-ID: <20040518100503.GG845@darkness.comp.waw.pl> In-Reply-To: <20040518024346.A5068@xorpc.icir.org> References: <20040518092439.GF845@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <20040518024346.A5068@xorpc.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--g+nE7Lp8ucACtfsu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 02:43:46AM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote: +> On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 11:24:39AM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: +> > Hi. +> >=20 +> > Do we still need ia_netboradcast field? It is calculated depending on +> > old-fashion classes (A, B, C). Is it used still? +> > I wonder if ia_broadaddr isn't sufficient today. +>=20 +> not just that, it seems that ia_netboradcast contains bogus info. So? +> This said, how do you plan to handle the alias search, by +> implementing a per-interface hash table containing the +> addresses and broadcast addresses ? First I want to find all places that need fast processing and it probably needs hash tables for IPs and broadcasts, but I'm not sure if that's all. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.FreeBSD.org pjd@FreeBSD.org http://garage.freebsd.pl FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --g+nE7Lp8ucACtfsu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAqd/PForvXbEpPzQRAmchAKCQHB8KmMY3RH17R+21D90U9yD2SACfSn4M BXBbVPX6t6OmvEewUf1/Lc0= =22i5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --g+nE7Lp8ucACtfsu--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040518100503.GG845>