Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2025 04:55:30 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 289871] bsdinstall, FreeBSD-set-minimal, csh or tcsh: unable to login following installation of the OS Message-ID: <bug-289871-227-k7TIOuNQYF@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-289871-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=289871 Sulev-Madis Silber <bugs-freebsd-org916@ketas.si.pri.ee> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs-freebsd-org916@ketas.s | |i.pri.ee --- Comment #2 from Sulev-Madis Silber <bugs-freebsd-org916@ketas.si.pri.ee> --- i also looked that decision and was wtf ok, maybe it's reasonable in *minimal* set however i find whole push to sh strange. there are features in there that are not in sh or iirc even in bash now i hear from people that csh was never meant to be used, noone uses it, etc, even back in 4.6 i installed everyone supposedly went bash? note that it doesn't mean one needs to script in it unsure if this magical reason for switch came from users or what? all i saw was in one day shell is now sh line was in release notes and that was it i still don't know what to think of this, setting less-featured shell as default? unsure if this is maintenance issue or what. or like we already have one shell? but having whole 3 separate firewalls is completely okay? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-289871-227-k7TIOuNQYF>