Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:47:24 -0700 From: Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: contrib/jemalloc Message-ID: <262B5FAD-734F-48BD-B23D-0A9E2ED0FCDA@canonware.com> In-Reply-To: <201204050933.07368.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <431CB493-836B-4DF4-AC42-A7C6ABF7DE3E@canonware.com> <201204050933.07368.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Apr 5, 2012, at 6:33 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, April 05, 2012 12:56:45 am Jason Evans wrote: >>=20 >> * Will the utrace feature be missed? I removed it some time ago, = mainly because traces are impossibly large for most real-world use = cases. >=20 > I will only speak to this one. I do still find this useful (I used it = most > recently a week or so ago). It would be nice to keep if it is not a = major > pain to maintain. Okay, I re-added utrace support. It isn't very invasive, so = maintainability shouldn't be a problem. = http://people.freebsd.org/~jasone/patches/jemalloc_20120405a.patch Thanks, Jason=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?262B5FAD-734F-48BD-B23D-0A9E2ED0FCDA>