Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:41:43 +0100 From: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> To: pav@freebsd.org Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports UIDs Message-ID: <BANLkTi=FeXUcAxE8ReP%2BJtJWxSGoVTEiOA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1308083456.84213.7.camel@hood.oook.cz> References: <201106141639.p5EGdJ2k003510@repoman.freebsd.org> <1308083456.84213.7.camel@hood.oook.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2011/6/14 Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org>: > Maybe I missed something, but why do we need nobody user here, when we > already have it in default master.passwd on every new installation? > > $ grep nobody /usr/src/etc/master.passwd > nobody:*:65534:65534::0:0:Unprivileged user:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin > Because the code in bsd.port.mk fails if a group is in GROUPS but not GIDs. Of course, I realised as you pointed that out that it's unnecessary, because the nobody reference isn't in GROUPS, so not parsed by that code. Should I remove the line in UIDs / GIDs? Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTi=FeXUcAxE8ReP%2BJtJWxSGoVTEiOA>