Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 11:04:23 -0400 From: George Neville-Neil <gnn@neville-neil.com> To: george@ceetonetechnology.com Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: "Crochet" build tool Message-ID: <1CBF1416-3237-4DCE-8D61-7E998265C887@neville-neil.com> In-Reply-To: <5151B454.9090402@ceetonetechnology.com> References: <CFBA557F-3DB9-40BA-B222-8E8C67707C9B@freebsd.org> <5DFA61DB-70E4-4C3D-ACA0-995A175706C8@neville-neil.com> <5151B454.9090402@ceetonetechnology.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 26, 2013, at 10:44 , George Rosamond = <george@ceetonetechnology.com> wrote: > Integrating into base would be nice. >=20 > My question would be: just for ARM, or as Tim mentions in his script, > potentially for other architectures also? My thought is that it's more about the fact that you're building for = embedded and the cross archticture part is tangential, but I also don't want to = dump a ton of work on Tim on top of what he's already done. > If so what would be benefit/difference with NanoBSD if Tim's script = was > used for other architectures? >=20 > For embedded-type systems on i386, I always built my own and never got > into Nano. I think this is to make it easier for folks who don't normally do this = to do this. Those of us, you included, who can build their own one off scripts can = do that but the project needs a good way to package this stuff and Tim's script is the best thing to come along in a while. Best, George
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1CBF1416-3237-4DCE-8D61-7E998265C887>