Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 15:06:02 +0000 From: Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: base64.h problems with rtorent port Message-ID: <CAFDf7UKa1WQuyWO2qibWyxN07iLH-UTzJ2VFLs4nDKehLUvE9A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <klbryd2bya5ybkjcpp26xu6bplu6yzsmvjd7qsd4xfdv7qphsj@cn4d6bea3igl> References: <CAFDf7UJ3uc0jUasWwOUK1cQkWV65Za9uR=z6kcPCaD36QwcX1A@mail.gmail.com> <e794b549374b282f1b5211f703a86a8682215fde@freebsd.org> <CAFDf7U%2BLkfSXDCP0kw8jvd-6Xue0ge1mubrDBOotCq9cuMP3aA@mail.gmail.com> <boltawtg355cfkad4ko6wl6gli7a3ijqtlzpxqmtov2qgbi6if@pqdpvbb7emd5> <CAFDf7U%2ByL8uBKQKW83WDwQVo=HGUWrAg_6h7KD21E18R58gxWg@mail.gmail.com> <klbryd2bya5ybkjcpp26xu6bplu6yzsmvjd7qsd4xfdv7qphsj@cn4d6bea3igl>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Nice! I will do that, `--with-xmlrpc-tinyxml2` directly on port config ala linux distros. Thanks! Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> escreveu (sexta, 27/12/2024 à(s) 14:54): > On Fri 27 Dec 14:24, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > Perfect! > > > > I'm thinking using a radio option where we can select one of xml parsers > or > > none as supported upstream, defaulting to TINYXML. > > > > A quick look in repology shows that at least 3 linux distros use directly > > `--with-xmlrpc-tinyxml2` with 0.15.0 pkgs. I'm ok with simplifying port > or > > keep radio option. > > > > Cheers! > > My understanding is users have no idea what the difference is, upstream > recommands their new xmlrpc implementation, we probably only provide this > implementation and if we have reports of issues without, switch back to the > xmlrpc-c based one until upstream fixes the issue. > > Which means in the end drop entirely the option ;) > > Best regards, > Bapt > -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: <eduardo@FreeBSD.org> Web: https://FreeBSD.org [-- Attachment #2 --] <div dir="ltr"><div>Nice! I will do that, `--with-xmlrpc-tinyxml2` directly on port config ala linux distros.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks!<br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Baptiste Daroussin <<a href="mailto:bapt@freebsd.org">bapt@freebsd.org</a>> escreveu (sexta, 27/12/2024 à(s) 14:54):<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Fri 27 Dec 14:24, Nuno Teixeira wrote:<br> > Perfect!<br> > <br> > I'm thinking using a radio option where we can select one of xml parsers or<br> > none as supported upstream, defaulting to TINYXML.<br> > <br> > A quick look in repology shows that at least 3 linux distros use directly<br> > `--with-xmlrpc-tinyxml2` with 0.15.0 pkgs. I'm ok with simplifying port or<br> > keep radio option.<br> > <br> > Cheers!<br> <br> My understanding is users have no idea what the difference is, upstream<br> recommands their new xmlrpc implementation, we probably only provide this<br> implementation and if we have reports of issues without, switch back to the<br> xmlrpc-c based one until upstream fixes the issue.<br> <br> Which means in the end drop entirely the option ;)<br> <br> Best regards,<br> Bapt<br> </blockquote></div><div><br clear="all"></div><br><span class="gmail_signature_prefix">-- </span><br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><font color="#888888">Nuno Teixeira</font></div><div><div><font color="#888888"> FreeBSD UNIX: <eduardo@FreeBSD.org> Web: <a href="https://FreeBSD.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://FreeBSD.org</a><br></font></div></div></div></div>;home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFDf7UKa1WQuyWO2qibWyxN07iLH-UTzJ2VFLs4nDKehLUvE9A>