Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 23:15:04 +0000 From: "Peel, Casey" <casey.peel@isilon.com> To: Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" <freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Diff to fix pjdfstest tests Message-ID: <16437CC5729B5345AF77F816513376E820BAE703@MX103CL02.corp.emc.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGHfRMCzpYnZmgk0CEAG4u%2Bvo2dT7Gp-C5kkGWxCmV224GDgYQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <16437CC5729B5345AF77F816513376E820BAE6A1@MX103CL02.corp.emc.com> <CAGHfRMCzpYnZmgk0CEAG4u%2Bvo2dT7Gp-C5kkGWxCmV224GDgYQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----Original Message----- From: Garrett Cooper [mailto:yaneurabeya@gmail.com]=20 > Have you looked at what I did on > https://github.com/yaneurabeya/pjdfstest (in particular I was working > on the onefs branch back when I was with EMC)? Ummm.. no. How much of your work am I just recreating? :) At the moment I'm targeting UFS, but I can see I'll need your noexec change= s when I start targeting OneFS. So if it's clear that these things are wrong and you have them corrected, w= hy can't we get them pushed up to -CURRENT? -- Casey -- Performance Test Ninja casey.peel@isilon.com / 206.777.7945
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16437CC5729B5345AF77F816513376E820BAE703>