Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 06:29:39 +0100 From: Zoran Kolic <zkolic@sbb.rs> To: Kurt Buff <kurt.buff@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nomenclature for conf files Message-ID: <20121112052939.GA1309@mycenae.sbb.rs> In-Reply-To: <CADy1Ce6W4nfQHvHNx7YO9jEc6Aou9hjtHzdVV9xhxZ-rGzWhmQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <20121112051229.GA1235@mycenae.sbb.rs> <CADy1Ce6W4nfQHvHNx7YO9jEc6Aou9hjtHzdVV9xhxZ-rGzWhmQ@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> > WITH_KMS=YES
> > WITH_KMS="YES"
> > WITH_KMS=yes
>
> With regard to their use in /etc/rc.conf, no, absolutely not.
> In general, from my experience, only the second one will work.
Yep, in rc.conf only the second one. I was thinking of make.conf.
It is the place kms should be set. Loader conf might take only
"" versions also.
Thank you and best regards
Zoran
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121112052939.GA1309>