Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 08:42:06 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS Message-ID: <20020416084206.A19392@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020416085802.64976K-100000@fledge.watson.org>; from rwatson@FreeBSD.org on Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 09:01:26AM -0400 References: <XFMail.20020415114544.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020416085802.64976K-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 09:01:26AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > It would be nice if MAINTAINERS was sorted in some manner I comprehended. Feel free to pick a semi-rational sort method (and tell us what it is). > :-) Likewise, it would be nice to constrain the set of entries in the > "notes" column to a fairly standard set, and call it "constraints", with Now you are strongly legistating, and distracting from what I wanted it to be -- a way for someone that calls themself a maintainer to tell their intentions. Some committers obey's "those that call themselves" maintainers; and others do not. That is why this file is only trying to tell intention. I totally realize some will pay attention to its contents, and others will not. I strongly prefer the free-form notes. If you want to add the path rather than "module", I do not care. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020416084206.A19392>