Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:41:31 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230888] Missing 64 bit atomic functions for i386 (libatomic) Message-ID: <bug-230888-29464-KtISHRaV1V@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-230888-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230888 --- Comment #20 from Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #19) I have no specific plans for this particular bug, but my personal preference would be to merge llvm/clang/libc+/etc 9.0 (and later) into stable/12 and stable/11. Because in practice, clang 8.0 and earlier have generating code that will only run on i586 and higher anyway, for a long time, even if you *did* pass -march=i486! That said, I know some people are of the opinion that stable branches should receive far less "feature updates", or even none at all, and only security or "P1" bug fixes. Therefore, this is not really my call, but I gladly leave it up to the community to decide. :) Note that this latter scenario (stable branches getting no feature updates) will almost certainly require either stable branches for ports in general, or the ports collection stopping to use the base toolchains and only using their own. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-230888-29464-KtISHRaV1V>