Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 17:16:45 -0800 (PST) From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Cc: obrien@NUXI.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: removing f2c from base distribution Message-ID: <199901270116.RAA64007@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <199901262148.NAA07097@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> (message from Steve Kargl on Tue, 26 Jan 1999 13:48:41 -0800 (PST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> * Yes, I recognize that this is problem. A partial solution might * be anoncvs to a shadow tree of the master ports repository. Only * those ports in the shadow tree which satisfy portlint and "make; * make install; make package" would get committed to the master * repository. * * Now, if Satoshi has read the above, could someone please revive him * and make sure he takes his heart medication ;-) Um, I'm still alive but can someone explain me why this can't be a "regular" port? Being useful to some but not the majority, no other parts of the system depending on it, this looks like a model citizen in the ideal ports world. :) Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901270116.RAA64007>